The Earth’s climate is changing and there is concern about the potentially adverse effects of these changes on life on the planet. What is your position on the following measures that have been proposed to address global climate change—a cap-and-trade system, a carbon tax, increased fuel-economy standards, and research? Are there other policies you would support?
Jim Trakas
We need to get serious about pollution abatement, but we must also not destroy our ecnonomy in so doing, which we have been doing and must be careful not to keep doing.
Our pollution control measures really work to stifle jobs in America, and have done little to abate pollution. I would make government a partner with industry to abate pollution, and understand that it took many years to create these problems, and they will not be solved soon.
Specifically:
1. I oppose cap and trade as a job killer, very expensive for consumers who are already getting rocked by high energy costs (and cap and trade would make it much worse, crippling the poor, working and middle class. Carbon Tax is just as bad, and increased CAFE standards without monetary help to the US auto industry would hasten its demise and put more Americans out of work.
2. Any pollution abatement protocol must include all nations of the world, so that we do not put American workers jobs at risk, while letting places like China and India pollute, while putting American workers at a serious disavantage.
3. I would create partnerships with government to assist polluting industries to help pay to clean up the environment with new technologies. This will be very expensive, but necessary, and a high public priority.
4. We need to invest in new technologies to bring clean buring fuel cells and battery technologies to fruition, assist the U.S. automotive industry to make first hybrid, then fuel cell vehicles, as well as expand clean coal technology, wind, solar, and other alternatives.
5. We must be patient, do this right, and not destroy our present economy in the process.