Scientists & Engineers for America

Donald Manzullo


202-225-5676
2228 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-1316

Campaign Contact Information

Campaign Email
Campaign Website
815-394-1992
P.O. Box 7783
Rockford, IL 61126

Biography

MANZULLO, Donald A., a Representative from Illinois; born in Rockford, Winnebago County, Ill., March 24, 1944; graduated from Auburn High School, Rockford, Ill., 1962; B.A., American University, Washington, D.C., 1967; J.D., Marquette University School of Law, Milwaukee, Wis., 1970; lawyer, private practice; unsuccessful candidate for nomination to the One Hundred Second Congress in 1990; member, Republican National Committee; elected as a Republican to the One Hundred Third and to the six succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1993-present); chair, Committee on Small Business (One Hundred Seventh and One Hundred Ninth Congresses).

CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Compare Innovation & the Elections 2008 responses for IL-16.


SEA and eighteen other science organizations have come together to ask the 2008 congressional candidates seven questions on science and technology policy. See what Donald Manzullo has said:

Innovation

Science and technology have been responsible for half of the growth of the American economy since World War II. But several recent reports question America’s continued leadership in these vital areas. What policies would you support to ensure that America remains the world leader in innovation?
Changes in the global economy pose increasing risks to our global competitive edge. To maintain America's leadership, we must encourage private-public partnerships that focus on innovation, education (especially math and science), and entrepreneurship. That is why I founded the EIGERlab in Rockford, IL, to study and innovate the next generation of American manufacturing.

Climate Change

The Earth’s climate is changing and there is concern about the potentially adverse effects of these changes on life on the planet. What is your position on the following measures that have been proposed to address global climate change—a cap-and-trade system, a carbon tax, increased fuel-economy standards, and research? Are there other policies you would support?
I am very concerned about the impact of worldwide pollution on the health of the American people. As a senior member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, I offered legislation to fight the scourge of global pollution. By taking a holistic view of protecting our environment we will address the root causes of climate change and the potential damage pollution has on the health of our families. Too much time is spent arguing about climate change and not enough practical technical solutions are being done right now to address its devastating consequences. I also have concerns about the implementation of any carbon cap and trade scheme in order to insure that (1) our pollution problems are not exported to a less developed country and (2) it doesn’t provide yet another regulatory incentive to simply move manufacturing operations overseas. I already supported an increase in our fuel-economy standards that also insured that our American car manufacturers were not disadvantaged. Finally, I believe the most promising option is expanded research and development – and deployment – of new technologies offers the most practical solution to the problem of global pollution.

Energy

Many scientists and policymakers say energy security and sustainability are major problems facing the United States this century. What policies would you support to meet the demand for energy while ensuring an economically and environmentally sustainable future?
I support policies that will end America’s addiction to foreign oil. Specifically, I believe strongly that America must reduce the strategic value and chokehold that oil has on our economy. Through the deployment of renewable, alternative, and domestically produced energy we can transform our economy into one that is less dependant on foreign oil. In addition, we need to develop new types of transportation vehicle that is not powered only by gasoline.

Education

A comparison of 15-year-olds in 30 wealthy nations found that average science scores among U.S. students ranked 17th, while average U.S. math scores ranked 24th. What role do you think the federal government should play in preparing K-12 students for the science and technology driven 21st Century?
Science and technology underpin our economic strength and national security, making education in these disciplines critically important to the welfare of our country. That is why I am a member of the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Caucus, where I regularly confer with my colleagues to discuss ways to strengthen education in these areas. I have also supported initiatives to create a STEM Scholarship Database, which would house all scholarships, loans, and grants that are available in these fields. Additionally, I consistently encourage private industry to engage with public schools and develop a curriculum that will ensure that our students are better prepared to meet the demand for highly skilled workers. Ensuring that our students have the skills to compete in a knowledge-based, global economy will continue American leadership in the fields of science and technology.

Water

Thirty-nine states expect some level of water shortage over the next decade, and scientific studies suggest that a majority of our water resources are at risk. What policies would you support to meet demand for water resources?
I agree that this is a serious issue. That’s why I voted for various water quality improvement bills over the years, including HR 700 to help local communities provide water from alternative sources in an environmentally sustainable manner and HR 1495 to fund the improvements to over 900 water resource development projects and studies by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Research

For many years, Congress has recognized the importance of science and engineering research to realizing our national goals. Given that the next Congress will likely face spending constraints, what priority would you give to investment in basic research in upcoming budgets?
It is important for all funding levels to be maintained for government priorities, including those dedicated to science and engineering research.

Health

Americans are increasingly concerned with the cost, quality, and availability of health care. How do you see science, research, and technology contributing to improved health and quality of life?
Coordinated funding for health research programs is an important role of the federal government. Specifically, medical research is critical to helping understand the causes of diseases and how best to treat individuals. When it comes to health research, I strongly support funding research programs through the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Through my efforts, the funding for NIH was doubled over a five year period ending in fiscal year 2003. I also recently signed a letter to the House Appropriation Committee requesting a 6.7% increase in funding for the NIH for Fiscal Year 2008.

Login/Register to EditDONALD MANZULLO ON SCIENCE

Education

Energy

  • Fuel Economy Standards
    • See discussion of CLEAN Energy Act under Renewable Energy section.
  • Nuclear Power
    • Nothing posted to date
  • Renewable Energy
    • In January of 2007, the House of Representatives passed the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 (H.R. 6). This legislation is intended to address a royalties oversight that occurred when the Department of the Interior issued leases for off-shore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico from 1998 to 1999. The bill would also deny income tax deductions for oil and gas companies. Revenues generated from these provisions would be used for the development of alternative fuels and renewable energy sources. Opponents of the bill claimed that the legislation would raise costs for the domestic production of oil and could increase foreign oil imports. Representative Manzullo voted against this legislation, which passed with a vote of 264-163.

      During consideration of H.R. 6 in June of 2007, the Senate changed the focus of the legislation into developing a more comprehensive energy bill that focused on the development of renewable fuels, energy conservation, and increased Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. In the face of a veto threat from President Bush, the House passed the Senate version of H.R. 6 with amendments by a vote of 235-181 on December 6, 2007. Representative Manzullo voted against this bill. The final Senate rendering of the bill, which passed with a vote of 86-8, still included language raising CAFE standards to 35 mpg by 2020. The final version of the bill passed in the House with a vote of 314-100 and was signed into law by President Bush on December 19, 2007.
    • In August 2007, Representative Manzullo voted against the final passage of the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007 (H.R. 3221). The legislation would provide tax incentives to promote the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency, including guaranteeing up to $1 billion in loans for the development of biorefineries and biofuel production facilities. The measure also would repeal tax deductions to income attributed to the domestic production of oil and natural gas. It passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 241-172 and was sent to the Senate.

      A controversial amendment to the bill was H. Amdt. 748 sponsored by Representative Udall. This amendment would require retail electric suppliers to provide 15% of their electricity through a renewable energy portfolio standard (RPS) by 2020. Representative Manzullo voted against the amendment, which was adopted with a vote of 220 to 190.

Environment

  • Nothing posted to date

Climate Change

  • Nothing posted to date

Health

  • Healthcare
    • In April of 2007, the House of Representatives passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007 (H.R. 493) with a vote of 420-3. Representative Manzullo voted for this bill. If enacted, GINA will prevent health insurance companies from adjusting premiums on the basis of genetic information and forbid requiring individuals to undergo genetic tests. The bill will also prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of genetic information. This legislation was passed by the Senate in a vote of 95-0. The House passed the Senate amended version of the bill on May 1, 2008, by a vote of 415-1. Rep Ron Paul was the only representative to vote against the bill. President Bush signed GINA into law on May 21, 2008.
    • On July 15, 2008, both Houses of Congress voted to override President Bush’s veto of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (H.R. 6331), a bill to put off an almost 11% cut of payments to doctors who care for Medicare patients. The legislation offset putting off the payment cuts for doctors by reducing reimbursements to insurance companies that include Medicare patients in their managed-care programs.[1] The House voted 383 to 41 in favor of a veto override. Representative Manzullo voted for this legislation.
  • Embryonic Stem Cell Research
  • Non-Embryonic Stem Cell Research
    • In December 2005, Congress passed the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005 (H.R. 2520), which President Bush signed on December 20, 2005. The law "creates a new Federal program to collect and store cord blood, and expands the current bone marrow registry program to also include cord blood." Representative Manzullo voted for this bill. The legislation passed the House of Representatives with a vote of 431-1 and passed the Senate by unanimous consent.
  • On September 25, 2007, the House passed the final version of the “Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act” (H.R. 976) with a vote of 265-169. This bill would have increased funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) by $50 billion dollars over five years. Opponents saw the bill as too costly and were critical of the funding methods for the program, including a cigarette tax increase (read the floor debate). Representative Manzullo voted against this legislation.
  • On October 3, 2007, President Bush vetoed H.R. 976, citing that the bill moved too many children towards federally funded healthcare. The House attempted to override the President’s veto, but the measure failed to pass with a vote count of 273-156. Representative Manzullo voted against the veto override. On December 29, 2007, President Bush signed the Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (S. 2499) which extends funding for SCHIP through March of 2009, but does not significantly increase the program.
  • On January 23, 2008, the House once again failed with a vote of 260-152 to pass H.R. 3963 to override President Bush’s veto of SCHIP. Representative Manzullo voted against this legislation.

Innovation

Research and Research Management

  • Funding
    • In May of 2007, Representative Manzullo voted for the final passage of the National Science Foundation Funding Authorization Act of 2007 (H.R. 1867), which authorizes appropriations for the National Science Foundation for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010. The final vote count was 399 to 17.

      During debate on this legislation, H. Amdt. 128 was offered by Rep. Honda that will allow the NSF to support the creation of K-12 curriculum focused on global warming, climate change, and actions people can take to lower greenhouse gas emissions. Rep. Sullivan of Oklahoma offered a secondary amendment, H. Amdt. 129, that would have required the education materials referenced in Rep. Honda’s amendment to "reflect the diversity of scientific opinion, including the diversity of opinion regarding the impact of human activities on climate change." Congressional Democrats criticized the Sullivan amendment as seeming "to suggest that there is an equal weight of evidence against that perspective [that humans are causing climate change] as there is in favor of it" (read the full debate). The Sullivan amendment failed by a vote of 166 to 250. The Honda Amendment passed by a vote of 252 to 165.

      Representative Manzullo voted for the Sullivan amendment and voted against the Honda Amendment.

Technology

    • In the summer of 2008, the House met to consider the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (H.R. 6304), which would give retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that wiretapped customers’ phones for the Bush administration shortly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The legislation also allows the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens for up to 7 days before obtaining court approval. The House passed the bill with a vote of 293 to 129, and the legislation was signed by President Bush on July 7, 2008. Representative Manzullo voted for this legislation.