Scientists & Engineers for America

Carl Levin


202-224-6221
269 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-2202

Campaign Contact Information

26115 Greenfield Road
Soutfield, MI 48076

Biography

LEVIN, Carl, (brother of Sander Martin Levin), a Senator from Michigan; born in Detroit, Wayne County, Mich., June 28, 1934; attended Detroit public schools; graduated, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa., 1956; graduated, Harvard Law School 1959; admitted to the Michigan bar in 1959 and commenced practice in Detroit; assistant attorney general and general counsel for the Michigan civil rights commission 1964-1967; special assistant attorney general for the State of Michigan and chief appellate defender for the city of Detroit 1968-1969; member, Detroit city council 1969-1973; president, Detroit city council 1974-1977; elected as a Democrat to the United States Senate in 1978 for the term commencing January 3, 1979; reelected in 1984, 1990, 1996, and 2002 for the term ending January 3, 2009; chair, Committee on Armed Services (One Hundred Seventh Congress [January 3-20, 2001; June 6, 2001-January 3, 2003]).

Election Update

Sen. Levin was re-elected in 2008 and will continue to serve in the 111th Congress.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY QUESTIONNAIRE

SEA and eighteen other science organizations came together to ask the 2008 congressional candidates and winners seven questions on science and technology policy. See what Carl Levin said:

Innovation

Science and technology have been responsible for half of the growth of the American economy since World War II. But several recent reports question America’s continued leadership in these vital areas. What policies would you support to ensure that America remains the world leader in innovation?
I have long supported funding for science and technology that supports innovation and U.S. leadership. For example, I joined in the Senate in a letter to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development urging more than $4.72 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science. In addition, I signed onto a letter requesting $6.85 billion for the National Science Foundation (NSF). Innovation can also be spurred through research and development tax incentives, which I have consistently championed. I will continue to fight for the extension of the R&D tax credit that drives innovation and improves the competitiveness of U.S. companies in the global marketplace. Finally, in order to ensure that our nation’s workforce has the ability to compete in the global marketplace, I believe that we must invest in education. This includes funding and improving programs for K-12 education such as CCDBG, Head Start, GEAR UP, TRIO and No Child Left Behind. During this Congress, I cosponsored the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote excellence in Technology, Education, and Science (COMPETES) ACT (S.761), which was signed into law, and establishes an Innovation Acceleration Research Program to promote innovation and competitiveness activities. The COMPETES Act also establishes grants for specialty schools for mathematics and science studies. Also, I believe that we must do more to encourage students to pursue education in the fields of science, engineering, and technology, and mathematics. Students who believe that higher education is achievable are more likely to succeed and to graduate and, though we have made significant strides with legislation such as the College Cost Reduction Act to make college more affordable, more needs to be done to ensure that all students have the ability to attend and graduate from college without an unmanageable debt burden.

Climate Change

The Earth’s climate is changing and there is concern about the potentially adverse effects of these changes on life on the planet. What is your position on the following measures that have been proposed to address global climate change—a cap-and-trade system, a carbon tax, increased fuel-economy standards, and research? Are there other policies you would support?
I believe the best way to address global warming is through an effective and enforceable international agreement that binds all nations to reductions in greenhouse gases, including major emitters such as China and India. If we do not get these countries on board, what we do in the U.S. will only have a marginal impact on controlling global greenhouse gas emissions while potentially creating a negative economic disadvantage to us.

While we are just now beginning to see the preliminary impacts of global warming, most scientists agree the problems of climate change, if not addressed, will only worsen in the future. The potential costs of global climate change are tremendous, and these costs will only mount if we wait too long to address this critical problem.

The U.S. needs to take leadership in developing and deploying new technologies to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The federal government needs to sponsor such research and development in advance of any imposed caps to speed the deployment of new technologies so that emissions limits can be met. With significant investment in research and development, and incentives for manufacturers to invest in new technologies, we can make great technological leaps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions not only here, but around the world.

Energy

Many scientists and policymakers say energy security and sustainability are major problems facing the United States this century. What policies would you support to meet the demand for energy while ensuring an economically and environmentally sustainable future?
I believe we need a long-term comprehensive energy policy that will decrease our dependence on foreign oil and reduce climate change emissions while promoting use of renewable energy sources and environmentally responsible domestic production of conventional energy sources. The federal government has a key role in the development of advanced energy and automotive technologies, both in providing funds for development and in being an early adopter of advanced technology. Tax incentives are critical for development of advanced technologies across the energy spectrum – including energy efficiency, renewable energy, clean coal, advanced vehicles, as well as clean and renewable low-carbon and carbon-free fuels.

Education

A comparison of 15-year-olds in 30 wealthy nations found that average science scores among U.S. students ranked 17th, while average U.S. math scores ranked 24th. What role do you think the federal government should play in preparing K-12 students for the science and technology driven 21st Century?
Perhaps the single largest reform that is likely to impact K-12 education within the next year is reform of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Signed in to law on May 13, 2002, NCLB was a dramatic shift in national education policy. I have heard many express concerns about the lack of funding and testing provisions of NCLB, the way NCLB has been implemented by the Bush administration, and the penalties associated with NCLB.

There have been a number of proposals to change NCLB, including making changes to the adequate yearly progress (AYP) requirements, ensuring that assessment criteria allows for some flexibility in teaching and learning styles, as well as ensuring that teachers are not simply forced to teach to the tests.

As Congress seeks to reform NCLB, I look forward to working with Michigan teachers, students, and residents to ensure that national education policy is formulated to best complement the efforts of our many fine educators in the State of Michigan.

Water

Thirty-nine states expect some level of water shortage over the next decade, and scientific studies suggest that a majority of our water resources are at risk. What policies would you support to meet demand for water resources?
I sponsored a joint resolution (S.J. RES.45) to ratify an historic agreement to manage Great Lakes water, the Great Lakes Water Resources Compact. This resolution was passed by the Senate on August 1, 2008. While the existing Water Resources Development Act law provides protection and authority to prevent diversions, the Great Lakes Compact will provide an effective means for Great Lakes states jointly to safeguard water for future generations. The Compact will ban new diversions from the Basin with certain limited exceptions, and those exceptions would be regulated. Further, the Compact keeps the authority to govern our water in the hands of the Great Lakes states.

The Compact states that “the protection of the integrity of the Great Lakes Ecosystem shall be the overarching principle for reviewing proposals.” For the first time, water conservation goals will be developed to deal with any water diversion proposals.

Beyond that, the Compact would specifically address withdrawals and diversions of both ground and surface water. This would represent an improvement over existing law because there are differing opinions on whether the current law addresses ground water diversions.

Additionally, because the Compact would provide a scientific method for determining whether to allow a proposal to divert water from the Great Lakes, it makes our efforts to protect the lakes more clearly compliant with international trade agreements.

* Statements taken from Senate floor statement on Great Lakes Water Compact (7/23/08), found on Friends of Senator Carl Levin website

Research

For many years, Congress has recognized the importance of science and engineering research to realizing our national goals. Given that the next Congress will likely face spending constraints, what priority would you give to investment in basic research in upcoming budgets?
Senator Levin has been working to ensure that science and research programs receive the critical funding that they deserve. For example, he joined in the Senate in a letter to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development urging more than $4.72 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science. In addition, he signed a letter urging $6.85 billion for the National Science Foundation (NSF). Innovation can also be spurred through research and development tax incentives, which Senator Levin has consistently championed. Senator Levin will continue to fight for the extension of the R&D tax credit that drives innovation and improves the competitiveness of U.S. companies in the global marketplace. Federal investments in basic scientific research pays considerable dividends, helping America compete in an increasingly globalized economy while keeping good jobs right here in the U.S. Over the last century, Americans have been at the cutting edge of important scientific and technological innovations, and we have much to gain from future research. Senator Levin will continue to work to secure critical funding for science and research to help strengthen our economy and support out educational institutions and industries.

Health

Americans are increasingly concerned with the cost, quality, and availability of health care. How do you see science, research, and technology contributing to improved health and quality of life?
I believe that we have a moral obligation to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable, quality health care and I have fought for, and will continue to fight, to ensure this becomes a reality.

CARL LEVIN'S RECORD ON SCIENCE

Contents

[edit] Education

[edit] Energy

  • Clean Coal Technology
    • During consideration of the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007 (H.R. 6) in the Senate, two competing amendments regarding coal-to-liquid fuels were proposed. S. Amdt. 1628 would have provided a minimum standard in the amount of coal-to-liquid fuels to be used in "covered fuels" (aviation fuel, motor vehicle fuel, home heating oil, and boiler fuel) beginning in 2016. While the amendment mandated the clean coal fuel to emit 20% less life-cycle greenhouse gases than gasoline, opponents objected to the comparison of coal to liquid fuel as similar to gasoline. They argued that liquid fuels derived from coal are more similar to diesel-based fuel, and emit up to 150% more greenhouse gases than petroleum-based diesel fuel. S. Amdt. 1628 failed passage with a vote of 39-55. Senator Levin voted against this amendment.
    • The competing amendment, Amdt. 1614, would have provided up to $10 billion worth of loans for projects that reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal gasification (or other transformation processes) by at least 75% and ensure that greenhouse gas emissions are at least 20% below the conventional baseline. Challengers criticized the 75% sequestration requirement as too high and voiced concern that the loan money would end up disbursed to other projects (read the debate). S. Amdt. 1614 also was rejected, with a final tally of 33-61. Senator Levin voted for this amendment.
  • Fuel Economy Standards
    • See discussion of H.R. 6 under the Renewable Energy section.
  • Nuclear Power
  • Renewable Energy
    • See stimulus discussion under Innovation section.
    • After a lengthy debate in June of 2007, the Senate passed the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007 (H.R. 6), which seeks to increase America’s energy independence through the development of renewable fuels and the fostering of energy efficiency. The legislation would mandate the use of 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2022, require an increase in the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards to 35 mpg by 2020, and establish a carbon capture and storage research program. Senator Levin voted against the final version of H.R. 6, which passed with a vote of 65-27.

      In the face of a veto threat from President Bush, the House passed the Senate version of H.R. 6 with amendments by a vote of 235-181 on December 6, 2007.The final Senate rendering of the bill, which passed with a vote of 86-8, still included language raising CAFE standards to 35 mpg by 2020. Senator Levin voted for the revised version of this bill. The final version of the bill passed in the House with a vote of 314-100 and was signed into law by President Bush on December 19, 2007.
    • During debate of the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007 (H.R. 6), the Senate also passed S. Amdt. 1693. This amendment would revise the Clean Air Act to provide short-term and long-term studies on the effects of the increased use of renewable fuels on the environment. It also allows the administrator of the study to create regulations that would mitigate any negative effects on air quality that did occur as a result of the increased use of these fuels. The amendment passed with a vote of 58-34. Senator Levin voted for S. Amdt. 1693. The amendment, however, did not make into the final version of H.R. 6, which was passed by the Senate on December 13, 2007.

[edit] Environment

  • After the House failed to pass S. 22 under suspension of the rules (which requires 2/3 to vote for a provision, but does not allow any amendments), the Senate called an unrelated bill, (HR 146), to carry the omnibus land bill. The bill is a combination of over 150 public land bills and will designate over 2 million acres of land as wilderness, improve the management of currently protected land, establish new water projects, and more. Swapping the original legislation in HR 146 for the land bill was designed to make finalizing the bill in the House easy.

    When HR 146 was brought to the Senate, Sen. Coburn (R-OK) introduced several amendments, though only one passed:
    • Amendment 682: to make it less likely that casual stone collectors would run afoul of the criminal restrictions on taking paleontological fossils from federal land (passed)
    • Amendment 679: to strike provisions that would block renewable-energy development on public land
    • Amendment 680: to bar new construction in national parks until the Interior secretary certifies that current sites are up to date
    • Amendment 675: to stop federal officials from using the power of eminent domain to take land from citizens. Critics say this amendment was unnecessary as eminent domain would not be used in any lands included in the bill.
    • Amendment 683: to eliminate what Coburn considers to be "frivolous" projects and
    • Amendment 677: to require an annual report on the total size and cost of federal property.
The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 77-20 on March 19, 2009. Senator Levin voted for this bill. It passed the House on March 25 and was signed into law by President Obama on March 30, 2009.
  • On January 15, 2009, the Senate passed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (S. 22). The bill is a combination of over 150 public land bills and will designate over 2 million acres of land as wilderness, improve the management of currently protected land, establish new water projects, and more. The Senate voted 73 to 21 to pass S. 22. Senator Levin voted for this bill. The bill then moved to the House where it failed passage on March 11, 2009.

[edit] Great Lakes

In the 111th Congress, Senator Levin introduced legislation costing $20 billion to restore the great lakes. Companion legislation was introduced in the House by Rep. Vern Ehlers. According to the Detroit News, the bill would set mandatory ballast water management rules for ocean-going ships that carry invasive species into the lakes; boost funding to clean up contaminated sediment; create a grant program to reduce mercury levels; and reauthorize the State Revolving Loan Fund for $20 billion over five years to upgrade sewage treatment capacity to reduce the amount of raw and partially treated sewage that is dumped into the lakes. The bill, S. 237, was referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

[edit] Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

Senator Levin was a cosponsor of the legislation that created the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In a press release, Senator Levin said that "It is estimated that the refuge could produce only a tiny percentage of our daily supply of oil."

[edit] Climate Change

  • With a vote of 51-42 the Senate rejected S. Amdt 1094 to the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (H.R. 1495). This amendment would have required the Army Corp of Engineers to account for the long-term and short-term effects of global climate change in all feasibility studies or reevaluation reports. Supporters of S. Amdt. 1094 focused especially on the dangers associated with increased hurricane intensity and rising sea levels. Opponents criticized the amendment as being too expensive to implement and refuted any relationship between hurricane intensity and global warming (read the floor debate). Senator Levin voted for this amendment.

[edit] Health

  • See stimulus discussion under Innovation section.
  • Healthcare
    • After being vetoed twice by President Bush in 2007, the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) (H.R. 2) bill was reintroduced in the 111th Congress on January 13, 2009. SCHIP provides a subsidy for children’s insurance for families that cannot afford private insurance yet earn too much to qualify for Medicaid. The cost of the program is funded by an increase in cigarette taxes of 62 cents per pack. After the House of Representatives passed the bill on January 14, the Senate voted 66-32 to pass it on January 29, 2009. Senator Levin voted for this bill. It was signed into law by President Obama on February 4, 2009.
    • On August 2, 2007, the Senate passed the final version of the “Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007” (H.R. 976) with a vote of 68-31. This bill would have increased funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) by $50 billion dollars over five years. Opponents saw the bill as too costly and were critical of the funding methods for the program, including a cigarette tax increase (read the floor debate). Senator Levin voted for this legislation. On October 3, 2007, President Bush vetoed H.R. 976, citing that the bill moved too many children towards federally funded healthcare. The House attempted to override the President’s veto, but the measure failed to pass with a vote count of 273-156. On December 29, 2007, President Bush signed the Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (S. 2499) which extends funding for SCHIP through March of 2009, but does not significantly expand the program.
    • The Senate passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007 (H.R. 493) with a vote of 95-0. After the House passed the bill in April 2007, Senator Coburn placed a hold on the bill because he wanted to clarify language to allow for "business necessity exemptions." The bill passed by the Senate was amended to reflect changes Senator Coburn wanted. After passage in the House, President Bush signed GINA into law on May 21, 2008.
    • On July 15, 2008, both Houses of Congress voted to override President Bush’s veto of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (H.R. 6331), a bill to put off an almost 11% cut of payments to doctors who care for Medicare patients. The legislation offset putting off the payment cuts for doctors by reducing reimbursements to insurance companies that include Medicare patients in their managed-care programs.[1]. The Senate voted 70 to 26 in favor of a veto override. Senator Levin voted for this legislation.
    • Template:Vote-FamilyPreventionTobaccoControlAct2009
  • Embryonic Stem Cell Research
  • Non-Embryonic Stem Cell Research
    • In December 2005, Congress passed the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005 (H.R. 2520), which President Bush signed on December 20, 2005. The law "creates a new Federal program to collect and store cord blood, and expands the current bone marrow registry program to also include cord blood." Senator Levin voted for this bill. The legislation passed the House of Representatives with a vote of 431-1 and passed the Senate by unanimous consent.

[edit] Infrastructure

  • Senator Levin voted supported reauthorizing funding for Amtrack. During a floor speech, he said that "Reliable passenger rail service is an important component of that infrastructure."

[edit] Innovation

  • Stimulus
    • On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (H.R. 1). This stimulus bill contains over $30 billion for energy initiatives including the Smart Grid Investment Program and advanced battery systems; $20 billion in tax incentives for renewable energy for both businesses and homes; over $8 billion for augmenting energy efficiency in federal buildings and housing programs; and $7 billion to extend broadband service to underserved communities. The Act also gives the National Science Foundation $3 billion for research; the National Institutes of Health over $10 billion for research and renovations; NASA $1 billion, a portion of which to employ more scientists; and the Department Of Energy’s Office of Science $1.6 billion for energy research. Finally, it provides $19 billion for a modernized Health Information Technology (HIT) system; $87 billion to help fund Medicaid programs; $1 billion for health prevention programs; subsidies for temporary insurance; and $19 billion for clean water and environmental restoration programs. For a more complete listing of the bill’s provisions, click here.

      H.R. 1 passed the House of Representatives on February 13th and the Senate by a vote of 60-38 on February 13th. Senator Levin voted for this bill.
  • COMPETES Act

[edit] Research and Research Management

[edit] Technology

  • See stimulus discussion under Innovation section.
    • In the summer of 2008, the Senate met to consider the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (H.R. 6304), which would give retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that wiretapped customers’ phones for the Bush administration shortly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The legislation also allows the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens for up to 7 days before obtaining court approval. The Senate passed the bill with a vote of 69 to 28, and the legislation was signed by President Bush on July 7, 2008. Senator Levin voted against this legislation.